Skip to main content

Research to Action

The end goal of research is to inform actions that enhance society by advancing knowledge. Successfully bringing research to action can strengthen systems and provide long term solutions that benefit society.

In many health areas the knowledge exists to address and treat preventable health problems and diseases, yet preventable diseases continue to affect a large part of the world’s population due to the knowledge not being translated to action. Evidence has proven that conducting research and publishing the results is not enough for an intervention or innovation to be implemented into policy and practice. More needs to be done. Thankfully there are ways to accelerate the time for translating research into real-world action by knowing what challenges might appears along the way.

Moving research into policy and practice can be a complex process. It requires the researcher to strategically plan, consider context in all aspects of the research – the design, the data collection, the dissemination, packaging, and communication. Researchers must network and get to know the system they are working in - including its social, economic and political features. This takes both time and effort. It’s a common occurrence that researchers do not plan for the translation process early enough, but rather once they have results from their work. Hopefully, this toolkit will help you start your process for translating evidence to practice.

Are you a researcher, a policy maker, or student? This tool is relevant to you. Researchers always want findings to result into action and this toolkit to help bridge that gap between their findings and real-world application. The tool highlights barriers to this translation at conception, design and implementation, and suggests tools for these. It guides on dissemination strategies to policy makers. Students use these tools to understand the process of translating research into actionable policies and practices. They learn how to critically appraise evidence and effectively communicate them. Policymakers use these tools to guide in making informed decisions based on the latest evidence

The Toolkit

To successfully move research and translate it into action, make sure you have the research-based evidence and the necessary skills to implement the initiative. Use appropriate methods to stay on track and ensure that you are connected to the environment where your research is going to have impact.

 

We have used the above the categories of Evidence, Skills, Methods, and Environment (ESME) to assist you in your endeavours. In each category, relevant tools and guidelines have been compiled to assist you in doing things differently.

 

It is important to remeber that research should be conducted with actionable outcomes in mind from the very beginning, rather than as an add-on at the end.

Toolkit Overview Method Environment Skill Evidence YOU /Click infographic above to learn more on each challenge/ Evidence Skill Method Environment

“Policymakers sometimes struggle to understand research process. They often seek immediate solutions for today´s problems yet quality research can take a longer time.”

Researcher, Tanzania

Having evidence (knowledge) to be translated into action is crucial but can be challenging step due to various factors. First, the evidence might not be 'ready', requiring more studies to prove effectiveness or causality. Sometimes, a systematic review needs to be conducted or dissemination needs to be well considered. Users of evidence need to be involved early in conception, through implementation and dissemination. We highlight additional challenges related to evidence as follows.

Some common obstacles:

  • The sheer volume of research evidence currently produced
  • Research findings/results can be conflicting and do not always provide the clarity that policy makers need
  • Poor timing and timeliness of research or its finding
  • Access to research evidences
  • Time to read EVIDENCE and the skills to appraise it
  • Understand and apply research evidence
  • Research that is not aligned with or informed by policy and action (therefore is not relevant to decision making)
  • Unactionable research findings

SHORTLISTED TOOLS

1. Systematic and rapid reviews (PDF) is brief tool to synthesize evidence when existing findings are conflicting, not providing the clarity that policy makers need. (6 minute read)
2. Dissemination plan (PDF) tool provides clear guidance which allow researchers to effectively disseminate /communicate their findings to Policymakers (5 minute read)

> Back to overview

“It is the how part, how you can change things, what you should do. Researchers usually don’t do that, they put the research on the table and say now you figure out what to do”.

Policymaker, India

As the quote above demonstrates, there needs to be communication and collaboration between the stakeholders, in this case the researcher and policymaker. The community that should be served by the intervention cannot be expected to alone figure out the most suitable method for implementation. Just as the researcher must engage with the end users and context to better determine suitable approaches for implementation, the community that is being affected must be aware of the research implications and understand the added benefit of the intervention for them. If mutual understanding, respect and trust are present, there is a much larger chance of collaborating on the best suited methods as well as best suited monitoring, evaluation and adaptation plans.

Some common obstacles:

  • Trouble finding the right implementation methods
  • Lack of coordination between researcher/policymaker
  • Lack of stakeholder involvement
  • Scientists often lack the training and therefore necessary skill to carry out dissemination efforts
  • Often lack of focus on how to distribute the research to end user/public
  • Operate within a small organisation or specific areas and do not engage outside their fields<
  • General focus on passive dissemination approaches (write papers etc.)
  • Lack of Internet access

SHORTLISTED TOOLS

Method – Monitor and evaluate
Method – Implementation strategies

> Back to overview

“As a programmer, if I am involved in the research I will be able to understand it better, similarly if a researcher can participate in the policymaking level then he will be able to make an impact in a better way”.

Policymaker, India

Some common obstacles:

  • Failure to adapt or customize knowledge to local contexts.
  • Miscommunication that causes misunderstandings between researchers and policymakers.
  • Poor packaging and presention of research findings.
  • Little understanding by researcher of decision-making processes and functionings of public systems they want to engage with

SHORTLISTED TOOLS

Skill – Adapt to local context
Skill – Assess and manage barriers and facilitators
Skill – Stakeholder communication and engagement

> Back to overview

“Some researchers may recommend one way which may be the most effective but not the cheapest – so we cannot implement it. In developing countries need cheap and effective recommendations”.

Policymaker, Tanzania

Barriers to implementation of research findings in real-world settings can sometimes be related to external factors that seem to be out of our control. As the above quote demonstrates, the lack of financial means can be what ultimately hinders the implementation of an otherwise well thought through strategy. It is therefore important to collaborate with other sectors and learn as much as possible about the lived reality on ground and become aware of political, financial, cultural and motivational aspects that may influence the chosen method, the uptake or the sustainability of the intervention.It is equally important to adapt to changing environments, engage with stakeholders and monitor continuously.

Some common obstacles:

  • Lack of finance
  • Lack of facilities or/and equipment
  • Bad timing of the research output and the policy agenda
  • Geographic barriers to easily implement research and discuss with colleagues
  • Political barriers; unstable regime, conflict
  • Lack or weak relationship with stakeholders and partners
  • Ownership of the research findings
  • Poor involvement of decision makers/implementors early on in the research
  • Decision making structures that do not provide for research input pathways

SHORTLISTED TOOLS

Environment – Understanding the baseline
Environment – Assessing the local context

> Back to overview

Want to know more?

There are many other recommended literature as references when you are digitalising the data. We have compiled a deep dive for you who like to read up more on the link below.


DOWNLOAD FULL LIST OF REFERENCES

We wish you the best of luck digitalising your information and data!


Operated by 
Karolinska Institutet in Sweden
and Makerere University in Uganda